Disqualified MP | RAGA | Digav Aaditya Singh Rajput
Today's article and podcast is about "Disqualified MP". How 'Father Of Power' is trying to keep quiet opposition in 'Mother of Democracy'.
I am fighting for the voice of India. I am ready to pay any cost.
Rahul Gandhi
Highlights
• Introduction
• Freedom of Speech
• Democracy
• Opposition
• RAGA
On IMDb, give this episode a rating.
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt16760256/
Rahul Gandhi is an Indian politician and a former member of the Indian Parliament, who represented the constituencies of Amethi, Uttar Pradesh and Wayanad, Kerala in the Lok Sabha. He is a member of the main opposition party, the Indian National Congress and was the party president from December 2017 to July 2019.
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has been asked to vacate his government-allotted bungalow at 12, Tughlaq Lane by April 22, days after he stood disqualified as a Lok Sabha member. According to the rule, a disqualified parliamentarian isn't entitled to a government accommodation, and is given a 30-day period to vacate the official bungalow.
The Congress leader was disqualified from the Lok Sabha on March 23 after he was convicted for a two-year term in a criminal defamation case. According to the Article 102 1(e) of the Constitution and Section 8(3) of the Representation of People Act, 1951, when read together, a Member of Parliament can be disqualified if he or she is convicted of any offence and sentenced to imprisonment for two or more years. The notice to vacate the bungalow was served by the Housing Committee of Lok Sabha.
A day after the Chief Judicial Magistrate’s court in Surat convicted former Congress president Rahul Gandhi in a criminal defamation case over his Modi surname remark, the Lok Sabha Secretariat on Friday issued a notification to disqualify Mr. Gandhi as the Lok Sabha member from Wayanad.
Calling it a “black day” for Indian democracy, the Congress accused the ruling party of “strangulating” democracy by trying to silence the voices of Mr. Gandhi and other Opposition leaders. It would fight the battle legally as well as politically, the party said.
Mr. Gandhi, who had come to the Lok Sabha in the morning and had attended a meeting of Congress members of Parliament before the notification was issued, later tweeted, “I am fighting for the voice of India. I am ready to pay any price.
‘Insult to OBCs’
Stating that the Wayanad MP’s disqualification from Lok Sabha was the natural outcome of the court order and emphasising that the law was equal for everyone, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) was quick to build a narrative that Mr. Gandhi’s 2019 comment about the Modi surname was an insult to Other Backward Classes (OBC).
“I have a question. Why do all of them — all of these thieves — have Modi Modi Modi in their names? Nirav Modi, Lalit Modi, Narendra Modi. And if we search a bit more, many more Modis will come out,” Mr. Gandhi had said at an election rally ahead of the 2019 Lok Sabha polls.
While BJP president J.P. Nadda said that such remarks reflected the Congress leader’s “pathetic and casteist mindset,” Mr. Gandhi found support from Oppositions leaders, including those who had earlier maintained a distance from the Congress such as the Trinamool Congress’ Mamata Banerjee, Akhilesh Yadav of the Samajwadi Party, K. Chandrashekhar Rao of the Bharat Rashtra Samithi and Arvind Kejriwal of the Aam Admi Party.
‘Truth to power’
Countering the BJP’s narrative of insulting OBCs, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge said that the ruling party had made all efforts to get Mr. Gandhi disqualified for speaking truth to power.
“This was not a question of backward class. Lalit Modi and Nirav Modi are not of backward class. They are trying to build a perception that Rahul Gandhi spoke against backward class. Mr. Gandhi was putting forward the truth before the country so they were not liking it,” Mr. Kharge said.
Case chronology
Linking the court verdict to Mr. Gandhi’s February 7 speech in Parliament about industrialist Gautam Adani’s links with the BJP, Mr. Singhvi laid out the chronology of the case. “The complaint was filed on April 16, 2019 and the magistrate was one Mr. Dave. In June 2021, Mr. Rahul Gandhi appears in court to record his statement in person. In March 2022, the complainant [BJP MLA Purnesh Modi] files an application to summon Mr. Gandhi again. When that application is rejected, the complainant then rushes to the High Court and gets a stay of his own complaint.”
The Congress leader then recounted how, after almost one year, on February 16, the complainant suddenly approached the High Court to vacate the stay, on the grounds that sufficient evidence had come on record. “The High Court vacates the stay, the man rushes back to the trial court and we get this order. Meanwhile, the magistrate is changed. We were not born yesterday,” Mr. Singhvi added.
Have a great day ahead,
Thank you :)
